🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has become part of the increasing number of performers who voice skepticism about the necessity of on-set intimacy professionals, explaining she chose not to use their assistance while working on her latest project Die My Love.

Understanding the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

On-set intimacy professionals were introduced following the #MeToo era to guarantee the safety and comfort of performers during sequences involving partial undress and intimate moments. Yet, numerous well-known actors including Jennifer Aniston and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their presence, with some claiming they disrupt artistic process.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her latest project where she portrays a woman descending into postpartum disturbance, the actress commented: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we had the option but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She continued: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations primarily revolved around our children and relationships. There was never awkward tension or doubts about professional limits."

"Had there been even a hint of unease, I definitely would have requested an intimacy coordinator. Many male performers get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and then the negative treatment begins. Rob was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Recently, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged intimacy coordinators as a separate category, together with multiple additional professional roles including dance direction, craft services, and puppet operation. Previously, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their own designation.

Despite this recognition, these professionals continue to face media scrutiny implying they aren't necessarily required standards, with well-known actors declining their participation. Lawrence's perspective echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she refused professional supervision while filming alongside her co-star on their television series.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be such a gentleman – I mean every move, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "The scenes were additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, suitable lighting. So, you don't prepare."

She added, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're seasoned actors – we can handle this. And we had Mimi on set."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring multiple sequences of sexual activity and regular undress, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning film about a adult entertainer and a Russian oligarch's son – proceeded without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star explained she and co-star her screen partner "concluded it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had researched the director's work and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I approached it as part of my job."

These statements generated strong reactions from industry professionals, similar to the response to another actress's public statements, who recently revealed that filming her new movie her latest film marked her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about personal ease with a specific move alongside co-star her younger counterpart, Paltrow answered: "I belong to the era where you remove clothing, you assume position, the camera's on."

Paltrow added that she and her co-star then informed the coordinator: "We think we're good. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick labeled them "irresponsible" and highlighted that the majority of those opposing intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to command their own power and protection on production locations.

"Periodically an actor shares opinions about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she came of age in a period when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood working with a man considerably junior than her, while I'm sure he is comfortable, I considered it quite an irresponsible statement."

Actor's Viewpoint

The veteran actor, in contrast, shared that he believes the main obligation during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, rather than a external professional.

"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the male actor to make certain the female co-star is comfortable, you talk through thoroughly," he said. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's extremely careful but seems like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance looks like."